House of Representatives on Wednesday expressed displeasure with the failure of the Department of Petroleum Resources, DPR to account for the millions of barrels of oil allegedly missing. Specifically, the House said that a whopping volume of 329,420,319 barrels valued at over $20 billion could not be accounted for by the agency between 2005 and 2012. It added that the same trend of infractions was also observed between 2016 and 2019. Chairman of the House ad-hoc Committee on oil theft set up to evaluate the unhealthy development with measures to stop it, Hon.
Peter Akpatason made the disclosure while meeting with the DPR. At a resumed hearing, the lawmaker said that directive has also been given to the DPR to give explanations on the stolen crude oil. He said, “The effects of crude oil theft cannot be overemphasized, and this has lasted for too long. As patriots, it is our collective responsibility to see to the end of this stealing. The Adhoc Committee has identified the key role DPR as the agency of government in the sector hence your re-invitation today to enable us work together and come up with a common front on ways to tackle this matter if not completely put an end to it, reduce it to its barest minimum.
“DPR is the agency of government saddled with the responsibility of monitoring crude oil production and lifting. The Committee requested and obtained schedules of crude oil produced and lifting between 2005 to 2019. “Forensic analysis of the data revealed a very wide margin between what was reported produced and what was lifted. Between 2005 and 2012, DPR reported production of 1,746,621,167 barrels from four sampled oil terminals of Egeravos, Bonny, Forcados and Bonga. Out of this production volumes, only 1,417,200,848 barrels were accounted for as having been lifted officially. A whopping volume of 329,420,319 barrels, valued at over $20 billion, could not be accounted for.
The same trend of infractions was observed in the years 2016-2019. “The Committee through the analysis of submissions to the Committee have raised issues requiring clarifications from DPR. These issues range from unprocessed crude oil, suspected stolen/diverted crude oil, discrepancies in records, use of inappropriate devices and technologies for measurement and gauging despite huge budgetary provisions”. Welcoming the officials earlier, Akpatason said that the mandate of the committee was not to witch-hunt anyone but to “proffer a lasting solution to this lingering cancer bedevilling us as a nation”.
In his remarks, the Director/Chief Executive Officer of DPR, Mr Sarki Auwalu explained how crude oil was stolen. According to him, most of the thefts usually come from land terminals because the land producers have to use pipelines to transport the crude into the terminals for export. “I will like to use this opportunity to give a brief on how we will account for hydrocarbon in this nation. I think that will provide a better view for this committee as well as Nigerians. The process starts well because every crude oil comes from well, and you cannot drill a well without knowing the capacity of that well to produce. So, the hydrocarbon accounting in DPR starts from well. “Once you drill a well, you will need to have what we call a maximum efficiency rate to know the capacity that well will produce. The volume accounting starts from that point.
“In hydrocarbon accounting, we have static measurement and we have dynamic measurement. The static is the volume that went into tank that you can dip and know the volume while the dynamic is the volume that goes across the meter. We have two kinds of meters: we have production meter that you measure the volume of oil produced and we have custody transfer meter where you measure the volume of oil that exchanged hands. “What we do is to take inventory of all wells producing in every field based on the volume we give, within which that well cannot produce more than that.
If you under produce, you can kill the reservoir. If you over produce, you can kill the reservoir. All these volume measurements, whether static or dynamic, we take record of them. So, where is the problem? The problem is that we have 30 terminals in Nigeria and these terminals, five are land terminals. “Most of the thefts, they are coming from land terminals because the land producers have to use pipelines to transport the crude into the terminals for export. In the process, you have a lot of third party interference in which those points of theft were there; small volumes that account for the larger volume are being taken and they are being stolen. “So, most of the discrepancies in production and export, you can easily calculate the theft volume. And the theft volume, if not all, come from the land terminals. But the offshore terminals, it is actually practically impossible to steal crude from offshore terminals, since it is from the bottom of the sea”, Auwalu said.
Vanguard News Nigeria